Your Daily Dose of Rachel, reading, and writing.
Condell is great. I'm not sure I've ever seen him quite so pissed off.
He is magnificent in his ire. I think I've seen a couple of his videos that come close. . . .But yeah, this the angriest.
Thank Allah the Euros have him talking reason. It's kind of sad seeing the light of reason being snuffed out over there. Just shows it isn't only here in America. Religion has to go.
I think that religion is fine as long as it doesn't try to impose on me.Unfortunately most religious organizations believe that it's their right to tell other people how to live.There should just be one non-partisan and secular law for all, within which people of all faiths (or non-faith) can operate without violating the rights of others.Religious enterprises should never be funded by the government.
I agree with John. There can be no happy medium on this. Religion should go, or there'll always be a chance of backsliding.Of the major religions, Christianity and Islam are all about the converts. (And if you've ever been accosted in an airport by Hare Krishnas . . . you've experienced firsthand the true, gritty horror that is "organized" religion.) As long as there's even one religion, there's be one zealot who'll happily wage war on unbelievers, and a bunch of braindead idjits who'll happily follow him.There should just be one secular, nonpartisan law for all, but I doubt one'll be coming down the turnpike any time soon. Religion should never be supported by the government, but even the Great American Hope, President Obama, won't take a sharp ax to Faith-based Initiatives. Hell, he invites bible-humping zealots into the White House in what I can only hope isn't an advisory capacity.Disease, addiction--pick your metaphor, religion can be easily compared to all three. We're certainly afflicted by, and addicted to plenty of other horrible things that do us no good. I'd say religion ranks somewhere between leprosy and cancer. Or between Big Macs and Crystal Meth.
Now, Honey, what got you off on that ridiculous atheist tangent? I know... you got caught with drugs in college, and the Dean expelled you, right? They wouldn't change the Bible for you, so you could do what you wanted, and you took your ball and went home in a huff, right?There's nothing wrong with religion, and you know it. It's just that people like to put their own interpretation on things... like atheists... and that's when there's trouble.Ask yourself... why IS it so impossible for there to be a God... 'cause that goof Condell says there isn't? How long as he been alive? How long has atheism been around? Now... how long has religion been around?Granted, he's a very eloquent man. Trouble is, you can be deluded AND eloquent. Look at Hitler... 'nuff said.Condell is a Dawkins wannabe, Sugar, and Dawkins has his eye on Darwin's laurels. They love the notoriety. "Oh... we're REALLY pissing off the Christians, now! Haw-haw-haw!" Actually, we laugh at them!Seriously... don't let a crew of infidels lead you astray, they're following a fallen angel who will dump them as soon as their usefulness is through. There's no second chances, you've got to get it right the first time!Remember... there's NO CHANCE with Atheism.None at all.
No horror can be more terrible than the daily torture of the commonplace." --HP LovecraftGood quote... and what is more commonplace than the notion that I'm here by accident and will pass to extinction and obscurity, whilst working like a slave for, essentially, nothing?How horrific is THAT?
Well, since you took the time to follow me here from PhillyChief's journal--which, btw, is fantastic, and loads more interesting, informative, well-written, and blasphemtastic than mine--I'll assume you're not a crank commenter, and are quite serious about everything you've said in both your replies. I will reply accordingly.Now, Honey,That's strike one. Two strikes, and you're ignored. Don't call me “honey”.what got you off on that ridiculous atheist tangent?Did you not notice the title of this blog? I tend to ramble. Atheistically, even. This is my space for ramblings of an atheistic nature. A “Daily Dose” of atheism--not to mention strident anti-theism. I don't simply believe there is no god, I loathe religion and pity its whores--I mean the faithful.(Note, also, that Mr. Condell was the one who delivered that fine rant. I wish I could claim credit, but I can't. Though our hair cuts are now similar, I am not Pat Condell.)I know... you got caught with drugs in college, and the Dean expelled you, right?Oh, you know, do you? And “the Dean”? What college do you think I went to? What am I, in the Delta House Fraternity?They wouldn't change the Bible for you, so you could do what you wanted, and you took your ball and went home in a huff, right?My university was private, but not religious, so the bible rarely came up, except in my World Religions elective. If you call graduating with a bachelor's degree going "home in a huff", then I did.(Side note: has anyone ever told you that over-the-top condescension is insulting, as well as unamusing?)There's nothing wrong with religion, and you know it.I know no such thing, only that it's a statement you've made in my blog, and one that I don't share. Won't share until there's proof--the burden of which rests on you, not me. Good luck with that.It's just that people like to put their own interpretation on things... like atheists... and that's when there's trouble.In my opinion, the trouble comes when the religion-afflicted refuse to accept that not everyone shares their particular delusions. That, in fact, some of us choose not to entertain any delusions, at all.Ask yourself... why IS it so impossible for there to be a God... Okay. I've asked it.'cause that goof Condell says there isn't? Ah, ad hominem attacks on someone who isn't present to defend himself . . . I now find my opinion swinging away from Pat and toward you.Not.And for future reference--though you come across as being a troll that won't reply to this, anyway--I'm not an atheist because Pat Condell says there isn't a god. I like listening to Pat Condell because I am an atheist who happens to share his views, as well as a love of beer and humor.Besides which, I haven't once heard him be anything other than spot-bloody-on.How long as he been alive?I don't feel like fact-checking that, don't care. But he's probably up there. At least sixty. Want me to guess his favorite color, too?How long has atheism been around?Oh . . . I'd say, that for as long as there's been one dumb ape who'll believe damn near anything, there's been another ape with mad critical thinking skillz, off in a corner shaking his head in horrified wonder.Now... how long has religion been around?Oh, I'd say that, for as long as there's been one curious ape with mad critical thinking skillz, there's been a dumb, incurious zealot-ape telling all and sundry that his pathetic little Super-ego is the voice of some god.Granted, he's a very eloquent man. Trouble is, you can be deluded AND eloquent. Look at Hitler... 'nuff said.And one can be deluded and ineloquent, as well. Such as in comparing Pat Condell to Adolf Hitler. Argumentum ad Hitlerum was tired ten years ago. Attempting to cast doubt on someone by mentioning Hitler in the same sentence is lame and transparent. And lame, because I can't stress enough how lamely transparent that is, even for an ad hominem. Try again. Or don't, if that's the best attack you can conjure.Also, you know who was really charismatic and leader of a nation at a relatively young age? John F Kennedy. You know who else met that criteria? Adolf Hitler.That's a true fact. You can Wiki it.Condell is a Dawkins wannabe, SugarI mentioned the not-addressing-me-as-a-condiment thing, right?How is Pat Condell a Dawkins wannabe? Please elaborate. And by “elaborate” I mean come bearing proof, not oily, patronizing assertions that are really just empty accusations.and Dawkins has his eye on Darwin's laurels.Again: proof, or some sort of inductive reasoning might be helpful. If you have any. If not, I'll gladly accept your apology on behalf of Misters Dawkins and Condell.They love the notoriety. "Oh... we're REALLY pissing off the Christians, now! Haw-haw-haw!"Dude, not everything is about Christians, believe it or not. Christianity's psychotic desert god is just one of many atheists don't believe in.Actually, we laugh at them!And nothing says WWJD? better than laughing at us so-called deluded and eloquent atheists. I hear the big Jay Cee was famous for laughing at people who were different. . . .Seriously... don't let a crew of infidels lead you astray, they're following a fallen angel who will dump them as soon as their usefulness is through. They haven't lead me anywhere, lol. I simply followed my reason. You know, that thing that can't exist simultaneously with faith? But I must admit, I stuck around because doubting our Lord and Savior is cool. All the popular kids are doing it, and I wanna be like them.There's no second chances, you've got to get it right the first time!I completely agree with you. This is the only life we get. No point letting religion, or the Great, Improbable doG muck it up with silly rules and rituals. There's no god to provide guidance for us, so we have to carefully figure out what is right for us as individuals and as a society. Now, If only there were some sort of . . . humanistic approach to ethics--and it would have to be completely secular, too, to avoid the known many known pitfalls of religion. . . .Remember... there's NO CHANCE with Atheism. No chance with what, or whom?Good quote... and what is more commonplace than the notion that I'm here by accident and will pass to extinction and obscurity, whilst working like a slave for, essentially, nothing?My view isn't commonplace at all, relatively speaking. Theists are a world majority. They're as dirt-common as . . . well, dirt.As for that last bit, about working for nothing . . . is that how you would view your life, if not through the lens of theism? Is working to support a family, to make the world cleaner, better, smarter, kinder, saner . . . "slaving for essentially nothing" unless it's done in the name of a mythological creature?How horrific is THAT? Not horrific at all, especially when compared to the other notions that abound . . . “after-lives” ruled over by zombie carpenters or jocks hurling lightning bolts, indeed.::snorts::I await your reply.
And wait, and wait, and....Ha! Normally I'd advise you to either completely ignore a troll like this, or just smack him down with some caustic remark. HOWEVER... the fool gave you exactly what you needed. Good job. Just remember (as you go along) that you need not refute every point (though it's easily done with a foe like Giddy). Giddy is a special case. He tosses a logical fallacy into virtually every sentence and gives you loads of amusing practice. Guys like him will soon be VERY boring to you. It's actually kind of fun to get into with a semi-intellectual theist. Don't worry, even with them you'll always have the upper hand. Facts are relentless allies!
I was really hoping he'd come back. He was so much fun! All my playmates run away. . . !::pouts::Ah, well. Guess that means hunting up fresh meat. I kinda think he was a crank, pulling a fast one. I mean--he hardly seemed for real with all the "honey" and "Hitler". Who actually talks like that?How do you pick and choose what not to refute? Wouldn't it seem like you're just skipping over the bits you haven't got an answer for? There are so many ins and outs to this, but the learning is exhilarating.Yes, like cabbages, facts are our friends :D
One way is by dismantling the toughest arguments first. If they think you ran from something, they'll bring it up again. If they are THAT interested in the subject, then lay it on 'em!Yeah, you should do some hunting. Just do a Google blog search for "Jesus loves me" or some such. I wouldn't recommend going in with fists flying. They DON'T have good responses, and an aggressive attack will get you ignored often. Engage in some polite conversation and then just start taking them down, point by point, comment by comment. It'll do you some good at first. But I'll warn you that you will tire of it - especially guys like Gideon. Cabbage is nice, but Brussels sprouts RULE!
I'm here, Johnny-boy! And... Hi to you, too... Pookie! ;-)Well, John-o, some of us have to work for a living, you know. That's why I'm not around just when you demand it. Why don't you Google up "Moronic Musings", and brush up on the latest Atheist bullshit, while you're waiting for my wisdom?Sweetpea... I'm not condescending... just ask any of my women! I'm sure you're an educated person, okay? I believe you. But, my estimation of you did go down a tad when you posted that video of shithead Condell, though.See, I don't like the bastard, because he's smug. That wouldn't bother me, except that he's as dumb as a horse turd, but he thinks he's something special. He pants after that Dawkins idiot... I think they bang each other on the side, lousy faggots... because their styles are similar. And, each one is as arrogant as a guy that uses an ape skull as an avatar. Btw, which one is that, gorilla-boy... Piltdown Man? We all know about THAT particular chapter in Atheism, don't we?Anyway, just passing through, and thought I'd check up on my favorite atheist-babe. Take care, now, Sugarbumps... Big Daddy's gotta go out into the big-bad world of atheists to help put bread on the table.Later...
Anyway, just passing through with his usual assortment of tools of ignorance (i.e. every logical fallacy known).You know, Giddy, if you had any decent factual points to make, you would avoid all that. That you not only don't avoid them but embrace them, is pretty damning of everything that comes off your keyboard. If your purpose is to prop-up the fast faltering religionists, your brand of ignorance... might work! But if you are trying to make any impact on people who have been liberated by logic, reason, rationality and reality, you will appear to be the frolicking buffoon of faith. Now, get back to work. Can't keep the man waiting. I take it from the bitter note at the end that "the man" is an atheist. Get used to it. The cream rises to the top! :)
Yo, Ape-boy...The only thing liberated with you is your liberal spew of bullshit, atheist-style. You run the same crap line of innuendo and rhetoric that you brand creationists as using, only with an infidel's slant to it.It just pisses you off that a guy like me could use the same tactless and smug behavior that you and your ilk use against Christians, on YOU, doesn't it? Your ridiculous blogs are FULL of insults and put-downs, and then you cry like widdle babies when you get the same treatment! Hey... read my lips... FUCK YOU!So, you think you know scripture, huh? Ever read about Samson? Yeah, he loved pounding pagan ass into the gravel. Mike wouldn't approve of what he did, but, God used him to show the infidels that His people weren't fucking doormats. The prophets, by and large, were peaceable-types, but, every now and then, there comes along an equalizer - so to speak. One, who could deal in kind.You cretins love making great sport of Christians, and when one comes along that wishes to debate with you in a civilized manner, you shit all over him. Well, here's one that takes that shit and flings it right back in your smug faces! I'm the one that you only break glass for in the event of war. I'm YOUR shadow... your alter ego.I don't respect you, and your feelings mean nothing to me. There are many good and conscientious atheists out there, the same as their Christian counterparts. You and I ain't those, buddy! We're the extreme edge of the slope... you don't go any further. Those aforementioned non-believers are honest truth-seekers... your crowd are just assholes trying to look sophisticated, and talk about condescending! You guys have that area covered REAL well.Oh... and the "man" is actually a woman, AND a believer... I don't work for atheists, and I never have. I've worked for many non-believers, who have a brain that's not fixated in any one direction like yours, but are willing to consider all things. They have my respect...You... get the rest...Piltdown-boy.
wishes to debate with you in a civilized manner LOL!! You run the same crap line of innuendo and rhetoric that you brand creationists as using Examples. Please! You cretins love making great sport of Christians I have to admit, this is one area you got me pegged on. But you make it so EASY, Giddy. You aren't very bright. Don't take my word on it. Take a sample of your "debating style" and find someone you trust who is intelligent (you DO know some such, yes?) and ask them to evaluate you. You aren't Sampson. You are intellectually, morally and socially challenged. You are out of your league here, Sonny. Run along to work. Mama's waiting. Hey, do you use all of those sexist lines on her that you use on Vitamin R? What? No courage of your convictions? What? She would slap your silly ass and toss you out jobless? Really, run along now. You aren't worth my time and I've lowered myself here. I feel dirty. Religious people... I don't respect you
"You are out of your league here, Sonny."I sure am... the a-hole factor is quite high, here. And, you're religious, too, butthead. Atheists love telling themselves they're not, but, like in so many other things, they're hopelessly deluded. You, Numbskull, are a part of the same old college, just a different fraternity.Oh, and I'm bright enough to realize that Darwin was a haunted man who blamed God, turned against Him, then returned to Him on his death-bed. See, unlike dorks like you, he understood ALL ALONG who God was, and is. He also understood where his ass was headed if he didn't acknowledge God.Those amateur 'mom-jokes' are a desperate fool's last hope, as he becomes aware he's met his better. I've seen many a troll resort to them, just as his ass went flying out the door.Vitamin Babe would love to be with a guy like me, and not some pimply-faced little shit like you, chimp-boy. I'd rock the pleats right out of her skirt, for her, whilst you'd have trouble getting out of yours, sissy-boy! LOL!Now, why don't YOU run along, and maybe go down to the zoo... primate section... and visit your grandma, Chimpy!Oook-oook!
Oh, and if you want examples of your rhetoric and other idiocy, just look at every response you made to Pastor Mike, loser-boy.Oh, and for fuck sake, pusscake, learn to spell... that's SAMSON, not Sampson... what, you into One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest re-runs, starring Will Sampson? Of course you are... a resident of the Cuckoo's Nest, that is! LMFAO!Your punctuation blows, too!Moron.
There's nothing wrong with religion, and you know it.Wow what an incredibly broad claim. So there’s nothing wrong with any religion that’s ever existed? Really?It's just that people like to put their own interpretation on things... like atheists... and that's when there's trouble.OK, we’ll stop interpreting things ourselves and just use your interpretation shall we? Ask yourself... why IS it so impossible for there to be a God... 'cause that goof Condell says there isn't?Nope.Ask yourself… why IS it so impossible for you to stop that malodorous arc of liquefied shit (that you seem to have mistaken for a slew of super-clever arguments) from flying out of your slack jaw and splattering all over the blogosphere?How long as he been alive? How long has atheism been around? Now... how long has religion been around?Lmao so who was the first atheist, Richard Dawkins?Trouble is, you can be deluded AND eloquent.Well I’m sure you don’t have too much trouble with that one.Condell is a Dawkins wannabe, Sugar, and Dawkins has his eye on Darwin's laurels. They love the notoriety. "Oh... we're REALLY pissing off the Christians, now! Haw-haw-haw!" Actually, we laugh at them!Yes and spend a countless amount of time and resources attempting to “refute” them. Remember... there's NO CHANCE with Atheism.None at all.Yeah, no chance of ever having to call a fucktard like you “brother”. Thor be praised!Dipshit.
CodewordConduit - welcome aboard. Unfortunately, you'll now undoubtedly have this infectious fly buzzing about your blog. He has a reputation now for following commenters back to their homes and depositing his filth. As you can see, he has a particular disregard for females and gays, but no one seems immune - as long as you don't buy into his notions of invisible men running the universe.
Codewordcuntduit...Now, don't get you panties in a knot, you can interpret anything wrongly that you want! Oh, and worshipping the Norse god of thunder must be anticlimactic, next to the thunder that rolls out of your arsehole after a copious feed of beans and cheap lager!The first atheist? Dunno... but Dawkins has my vote (next to you) for the dumbest! LOL!Fucktard? Oh... *sob* now you went and hurt my itty-bitty feelings, Cuntduit! Oh well... we couldn't be brothers, anyway, because that would mean that there must have been some inter-species relations going on... like maybe my father fucking your orangutan mother... and I know his standards, even for a non-Christian, are higher than that!Now, you run along, and worship Thor like a good pagan... don't forget to pick up a stalk of bananas for your mom, on the way home.Or a bag of Oreo cookies!
"Unfortunately, you'll now undoubtedly have this infectious fly buzzing about your blog."Well, you know the old saying, John-O... where there's shit, there's flies!Speaking of which... did you catch my last comments on your pile?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Now, don't get you panties in a knot, you can interpret anything wrongly that you want!Oooo that's bad grammar. Poor silly fucktard he tries so hard.The first atheist? Dunno...Well that pretty much blows your fucktarded argument out of the water, doesn't it?"... like maybe my father fucking your orangutan mother... and I know his standards, even for a non-Christian, are higher than that!Ah the crux of the matter. Daddy is an atheist and he was so mean to me! What was it - not enough pocket money? Never a word of praise when you so desperately craved his approval? "Notice me, Daddy!". Is that why you had to invent an imaginary daddy in the sky, Gideon? One that always has time for you and wuvs you, wuvs you, wuvs you...Poor little failure. Sky daddy loves you for who you are.
Yeah, Giddy. I saw you once again showing a woman what a pathetic little loser you are. I didn't respond because there isn't much more to say to you. It's just repeating after a while. If there were any depth to your comments, I'd respond.I'm not sure if CodeConduit is right about daddy-issues. It could be mommy-issues. I could make just as good of case that it looks like a woman hurt you. Probably both. You're a sad little creature.
Dear oh dear, I have been missing out. A Gideon after Grasping's own heart.
Ha-ha-ha! Amateur psychologists... gotta love 'em! Well, no... I guess I don't!Keep fishing, losers. Nothing like the analytical ability of a 21 year-old barely out of puberty, to guide one through this maze called life! I feel so... safe. Ha-ha-ha!My grammar's bad? Oh well, I liked grampar better, anyways! (Ooops... did it, again!)Hey, Cuntduit... why did you remove your first comment? Was it full of nasty-wasty words deriding ol' Gideon, Sweetums? Tut-tut! Musn't use sailor language around here, Pusscake, not with all of these virgin atheists listening! You're right... Sky Daddy loves me... and not like the way you 'love' yourself with the wooden spoon handle in the shower, either! John-O... you're not sure about much of anything, are you? Actually, I have a lot of woman friends... one liked me enough to marry me! Your "case" for my so-called daddy-issues, as stated, is about as good as your case for evolution, and for Pusscake's assumptions on pretty much everything that doesn't pertain to what to do around "that time of the month." You feeling bloated, right now, Honey? Hold your nose and fart... it'll clear your mind!Awww, c'mon... you've been real troopers, so far, responding to my comments. Now, I lowered myself to come here to this cesspool and try to show you an alternative viewpoint... and you say there's no depth to my comments? Well, I know they might not be of the calibre of say, THIS piece of work, but...Maybe that's Cuntduit's shadow on the wall, hmmm? Lookin' good, Baby!Yum!;-)
"Oooo that's bad grammar. Poor silly fucktard he tries so hard."Now, shall we analyze the punctuation, here? Oh, right... there isn't any!"wuvs you, wuvs you, wuvs you..."Bad spelling, too. Cuntduit... or should I say Can'tduit... are you one of those OBE graduates, Sugar? You know... one of the dumb-downed youth they're virtually throwing out of the high schools, these days? The ones that have to put the word "like" on each end of a sentence, and in several places in-between-like? LOL! And I thought the Valley Girls were twits!
Now, I lowered myself to come here to this cesspool and try to show you an alternative viewpoint... Let me say something sort of positive here. Trust me on this, Giddy. You didn't need to show up to let us know about this "viewpoint". We were all too aware of it. But you have done a marvelous job articulating it. And I completely believe you about being married, although it has nary a thing to do with the point of your misogyny. While I can only speculate about mommy-issues, I don't have to guess that you have a problem with women - and with gays... and it sure as shit didn't happen in a vacuum.Genghis Kahn had over 500 wives and concubines. Just sayin'....
John-O...This is going to hurt your head, but try and get this straight... I don't hate women. I do view certain individuals that like to imitate men, verbally and physically, as ones deserving of what they think that they're dishing out. Those, to me, are just other men... LITTLE men... deserving of nothing that the fairer sex is entitled to. That kind of consideration that you're pretending is only relevant in a universe governed by a moral entity. Apes view their females as a cunt and a tit, nothing more, nor should they. They are governed by instinct... as man should be, if the evolutionary bullshit were fact and not weird fantasy. Atheists envision a universe devoid of such an entity, therefore, your concern for my treatment of women is not only absurd, it's asinine.Gays are a non-issue with me. If they want to bugger each other silly, that's their concern. When I get in their face is when they try and pass off their aberrant lifestyle as something that God approves of, otherwise they hear nothing from me. I had two fags living down the street from me... one got the slim, and died. The other moved away. They were okay people, otherwise, but they chose to ignore the laws of nature and practice their own specious lifestyle.As for awareness... let me say that you know NOTHING about what you think you know. You're showing your flank, here, Johnny-Boy... what's your concern?
My, but there's been some real monkeyshines and shenanigans going on while I was away. My timing is for the birds.Vitamin Babe would love to be with a guy like me, and not some pimply-faced little shit like you, chimp-boy. I'd rock the pleats right out of her skirt, for her, whilst you'd have trouble getting out of yours, sissy-boy! LOL!Dude, what are you, twelve? If you can't make an argument without bringing petty slights into it, you might need to pause, and reevaluate your strategery. But if you like ad hominem attacks so much, here's one for you:Premise 1: My cock is much bigger than yours. Also,Premise 2: My cock can walk right through the door, with a feeling so pure. Hence,Conclusion: It's (my cock) got you screaming back for more.I call it Argumentum Ad System Of A Downum. Feel free to use it in any of your battles against the atheistic hordes, and good luck.All snark aside, you're not winning friends or influencing people here, so maybe you should just move on. No one here or in any of the other blogs you stalk takes you seriously, nor should they. You pester us with insults based in a message contrary to the point of our blogs, only to call us names when we remind you that you're not in Jeebus Camp, but an atheist blog, and that if you don't come bearing proof, or a decent argument, then . . . maybe you shouldn't have come at all.Your comments are silly and extravagantly pointless. But you have a right to believe and say what you like, of course, and I have the right to ignore your asinine bleating. A right of which I shall make very good use after this last comment.But before I do, a word to the wise: you may want to speak with someone about your apparent anger-management issues, and any of the other issues you appear to have. Whoever you think might be qualified to counsel you, be it minister or therapist, or even a just a friend (non-imaginary) who's a good listener. Okay?Alright! You have a blessed day :)
-ha-ha! Amateur psychologists... gotta love 'em! Well, no... I guess I don't!Keep fishing, losers. Nothing like the analytical ability of a 21 year-old barely out of puberty, [sic] to guide one through this maze called life! I feel so... safe. Ha-ha-ha!Glad to hear that I was wrong and daddy was a good man. Despite being an atheist!Hey, Cuntduit... why did you remove your first comment? Was it full of nasty-wasty words deriding ol' Gideon, Sweetums?No you daft cunt, why would I edit them out?Tut-tut! Musn't [sic] use sailor language around here, Pusscake, not with all of these virgin atheists listening!What makes you think that I’d be uncomfortable swearing at you?You're right... Sky Daddy loves me...So why so vitriolic fucktard?and not like the way you 'love' yourself with the wooden spoon handle in the shower, either!Wow Gideon you got cameras in my bathroom or something? Spot-fucking-on!…are you one of those OBE graduates, Sugar? You know... one of the dumb-downed youth they're virtually throwing out of the high schools, these days?If I am then you’re the first person to have ever pointed it out. The ones that have to put the word "like" on each end of a sentence, and in several places in-between-like? LOL! And I thought the Valley Girls were twits.No.Right you’re boring me now. You admitted yourself that your original comment on this thread was based on "I dunno"s – so seriously do you have any sort of argument to put forward?You’re wasting your time trying to get a rise out of me. I don’t care about you – you’re just a sad, anonymous sack of shit with no status or influence anywhere; and no real arguments to put forward.Fucktard.
Girls...I'm cracking up, here! You have no clue who or what you're talking to, right now! What's amusing... and I find this so prevalent in today's youth... is that you THINK you have it all figured out.Twelve years old? I wish! As long as I knew what I know, now, and could do some things differently. See, like you, I once thought that I knew it all, too. Oh, and Dad wasn't an atheist, sorry to disappoint you, there. You don't automatically have to be an atheist if you're not a Christian. I'd say he is an Agnostic, much like I was. Atheism, to me, borders on extremism... you know, like fundamentalists represent extremism on the opposing side. And, as for vitriol, I've sensed a good deal of that in your various posts, even before I showed up. There's a lot of repressed anger in some of you, and some of you are just milking it for your own ends, not particularly concerned one way or another.I've already gotten a rise out of you, or you all would have just ignored me. I probably went over the line, but I wanted you to see how others see you, and how offensive your remarks are to them. You don't really care what others think, I'm sure, so a little of your own medicine was needed. Didn't taste good, either, did it?If I were to give marks on performance, I'd say John Evo handled me the best. Typical phlegmatic, he.Anyway, I have no illusions that I've made friends, here, or gotten through to anyone. Tomorrow, I'll have forgotten all about you bunch. I'll give you all credit for not simply deleting my comments (maybe you will, yet!) or banning me. That is the norm, these days. I've been blogging for seven years, and have seen the level of societal intolerance growing exponentially, especially after 9/11, when the programming of the masses really went into high gear. See, what's really my area of expertise is Esotericism, and the study of secret societies and their influence upon our society. Religion ties into it, of course, and I am a Christian, for something like 26 years, now.But, yes, things are getting out of hand, here, and I'll be leaving. "Gideon" dies, today. I actually have another online identity, "Giddy" was just a recent and temporary facade.So, have a nice life, while you have it. Sorry you won't have any more than that, but, that's really your choice. Absurd as it probably sounds to you, you might think of this encounter as just one more knock at the door of your conscience. A rather profane and irreverent knock, perhaps, but the Lord uses all kinds in His work.Oh, and the topic was about Condell, wasn't it? He and I have crossed swords in the past. Just for your info, I happen to agree with him about free speech. It's important.So long!
"But, yes, things are getting out of hand, here, and I'll be leaving. "Gideon" dies, today. I actually have another online identity, "Giddy" was just a recent and temporary facade."I thought about it, Vitababe... I just couldn't do it! I can't kill Giddy! In fact, I gave him NEW life, and his own blog!It's been so much fun debating with you atheists, I just had to come back and give you all the good news... I'm just so tickled by it all! Tee-hee!See y'all, later!